Boston Could Attempt to Block Wynn Everett Casino Plan

Boston Could Attempt to Block Wynn Everett Casino Plan

After the town of Everett approved a casino project plan by designer Steve Wynn, many observers believed he had the upper hand in gaining the Greater Boston-area casino license one of three regional licenses that is going to be granted by their state of Massachusetts. However it turns out that geographical quirks will make Wynn’s prospects of opening a casino there just a little tougher than he thought.

According to members of Boston Mayor Thomas Menino’s administration, Wynn may not have been as careful as he thought with his casino proposition. It appears that some of this proposed development may be located inside the city of Boston itself, which would give the town the best to influence the project on their own.

Border Patrol

If it were true that the Wynn proposal were to reside partially in Boston, then the city will be considered a host community, and would have the ability to influence how and if the project could move forward. In reality, Mayor Menino would even have the capability to simply say no to the project, scuttling it entirely.

Menino might have reason that is good do so. He has emerge in help of a contending casino plan that will place the resort at Suffolk Downs, and eliminating perhaps the strongest competitor for the license would help towards getting that plan chosen by the state.

However, Wynn does not genuinely believe that Menino’s claims hold any weight.

‘Our company involves the Commonwealth of Massachusetts anticipating fairness and transparency, and we fail to realize Mayor Menino’s continued efforts to frustrate a project that has the power to transform the town of Everett, bringing economic opportunity that has eluded it for decades,’ Wynn said in a statement. ‘ We understand that the mayor favors another horse in this race, but we intend to remain focused on our project in Everett…By any reading, the host community for our project is the populous town of Everett.’

Murky Lines

The city of Boston bases its claims on environmental documents filed by Wynn with all the state. Boston’s city line takes a shape that is odd sometimes moving across the Mystic River and like the advantage of the former Monsanto plant that the casino will be constructed on. While there’s no doubt that none associated with the buildings in the casino would be positioned in Boston, there might be landscaping or harbor improvements that would technically be within Boston city lines.

During the moment, the issue remains unresolved.

‘The Host Community Advisory Committee doesn’t know whether or not the city of Boston is a bunch community [for the Wynn proposal], but in order to correctly do our work we must discover more about the growth,’ said Brian Leary, chairman of Menino’s casino advisory committee.

Also if Boston isn’t a bunch community, they might be looked at a surrounding community, meaning they could receive compensation based on how the development affects the city but they wouldn’t have the power to kill the casino altogether.

Compulsive Gambler Dad Sentenced for Kindergarten Funds Theft

An Australian guy was sentenced to four years in prison after he was discovered to have stolen more than $200,000 from his daughter’s kindergarten association. The cash was used to fuel the man’s compulsive gambling practice.

Periclis Telios pleaded guilty to one count of theft, admitting that he had stolen A$224,008.49 ($207,000 US) from the Ward Avenue Kindergarten Association between February and October 2012. Telios had gained access to the association’s funds when he became the committee president in November of the previous year.

Dipping Into Funds

The association is a volunteer organization that oversees each of the kindergarten’s non-teaching tasks. The funds within the association spending plan had been meant for costs like upkeep, new equipment, and trips and tasks, along with normal daily working expenses. The cash ended up being raised from a mix of fundraisers, grants, and charges.

Soon after Telios began to take funds from the association, it became apparent to the group’s treasurer and other people that there clearly was a severe shortfall, and it did not take long to make it to the basis of the problem.

Duration of Problem Gambling

Telios, 41, is married with two children. In accordance with County Court Judge Carolyn Douglas, Telios admitted when he was arrested since he was first taken to a casino as a child that he had been a problem gambler for more than 25 years, even. While the admission just came that he was stealing to pay off debts, not out of sheer greed after he was caught, the judge did accept that Telios was remorseful for his actions, and. Still, she said that their position was one of trust, and breaking that trust had been a offense that is serious.

‘In your place in the kindergarten in a local community referred to as lawn roots you held a situation of trust and responsibility with the organization, which consisted of other moms and dads of kids in your community,’ Judge Douglas said. ‘I accept that you have actually been punished by the fact that you reside among the folks you have adversely affected while having been reminded of your offending directly. Your loved ones have actually also suffered…and a decision happens to be made to not send your young daughter to the school that is local the families continue steadily to show anger in your direction.’

Telios’ phrase includes a two-year period that is non-parole. He previously convictions that are previous dishonest behavior before becoming the association president.

Borgata Babes Can Be Kept to Body Weight Limits, Judge Says

Since starting in 2003, the Borgata Hotel Casino in Atlantic City has marketed it self as an upscale, Vegas-style resort attraction. As a component of that image, the casino selected their ‘Borgata Babes’ the cocktail waitresses who would serve the largely male clientele while wearing skimpy dresses and high heels with a watch for attractiveness, including being on the slender part.

Once employed, casino management decided to enforce weight limits to ensure the ‘Babes’ stayed as hot as these people were when hired; a dictum that didn’t sit well with many of the feminine servers, a few of whom brought a situation against the Borgata, claiming that the casino ended up being engaging in sexual discrimination against them.

But Superior Court Judge Nelson Johnson don’t see it that way. Judge Johnson granted a judgment that is summary favor of the casino this week, dismissing the claims of the servers and upholding the casino’s policies. In the ruling, the judge determined that the rules could only be looked at discrimination should they punished a trait in one sex and not the other if they were only targeted at female servers, or.

The rules in question include the one that forbids servers from gaining a lot more than 7 percent of their body fat after they have been employed. While there tend to be more rules that the servers objected to, this was the one which garnered the most attention, and the servers claimed it was just ever enforced on female staff.

This just isn’t the first time these controversial rules have been taken to court. In 2006, two former Borgata servers sued the casino over the rules that are same and also alleged that management had humiliated servers by encouraging them to undergo breast augmentation surgeries. The plaintiffs also alleged other abuses, such as harassment over medical issues and disputes over drug test outcomes. That case had been eventually settled out of court without the terms being disclosed towards the public.

The Borgata’s fat requirements had been first placed into place in 2005, but appearance standards were established through the day that is opening of casino. Those requirements advised that feminine servers must have ‘natural hourglass figures,’ while male servers should have broad shoulders and waists that are slim.

South Australia Pokie Machine Reforms Watered Down

A few major elements of gambling reform bills within the Southern Australia (SA) Parliament were defeated or watered down this weakening the proposed changes from the government in that state week. While several measures were debated into the Upper House of this state legislature, other smaller reforms were arranged.

Venue and Bet Size Regulations

The SA national had established earlier this 12 months several proposals to regulate gambling into the state. The two largest had been a move to regulate video gaming venues in two sizes small venues with less than 20 machines, and larger venues which could have up to 60 machines and a limit on the size of bets on pokie machines (the name that is local slot machines in Australia).

The bet-limit sizing would have seen a current $10 limit on each spin paid down to $5 in the federal government’s vision. Independent MP John Darley desired to go a step further, proposing a $1 limit per spin. But, all of these suggestions had been beaten, making the $10 limit set up for the time being.

Limits to Limits Being Set

Not all the reforms had been defeated; parliament agreed to disallow devices that would let players plug in earphones and block out the noise around them in the venue, and video gaming was banned in areas where smoking was allowed. A withdrawal limit was also placed on ATMs in gaming venues, though this only brought the state in accordance with federal laws that will go into devote the long run.

Even the $5 limit may nevertheless have life, as The Australian reported that the us government there could have secured enough support to pass the modest betting cap after debate had concluded.

Still, the day had been to be considered a victory if you oppose gambling reform in Australia. One amendment that passed will delay the introduction of mandatory pre-commitment technology in the state, meaning machines that force players to create loss limits won’t be seen until federal law mandates they be utilized a romantic date that is several years away, as even voluntary pre-commitment will not be required until later this ten years.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *